DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490
BC
Docket No: 00234-14
23 September 2014
This is in reference to your client’s reconsideration request
dated 1 August 2013, with enclosures. He previously petitioned
the Board and was advised in our letter of 30 September 2010,
that his application had been denied.
His current request has been carefully examined by a three-
member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records,
sitting in executive session. Documentary material considered
by the Board consisted of his application, any material
submitted in support of his application, and his previous case
file.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board determined his request to change the narrative
reason for separation, adjust his discharge date to reflect
retired with back pay, was previously considered by the Board,
and found the evidence was insufficient to establish the
existence of material error or injustice. The Board determined
that based on the fact that he received and completed a level
TII alcohol rehabilitation program, was fully aware of the
requirements, and failed by having another alcohol related
incident, there was nothing to review other than his request and
enclosures. Accordingly, his reconsideration request has been
@enied. The names and votes of the members of the panel will be
furnished upon request.
It is regrettable that the circumstances of his case are such.
that. favorable action cannot be taken. He is entitled to have
. the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and
material evidence within one year from the date of the Board’s
decision. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by
- the Board prior to making its decision in his case. In this
regard, it is important to keep in mind that a presumption of
regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently, when
applying for a correction of an official record, the burden. is
on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of material error
or injustice.
Sincerely,
ROBERT J. O’NEILL
Executive Director
MEALS
*
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6846 14
Your current request has been carefully examined by a three- member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, any material submitted in support of your application, and prior case file. Bfter careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board determined your letter, even though not previously considered by the Board, was insufficient to establish the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5667 14
on 4 September 2014, you have requested a reconsideration of your case. evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an, official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06311-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your Your allegations of error and application on 3 December 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5680 14
Your current request has been carefully examined by a three- member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, any material submitted in support of your application, and prior case file. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board determined the medical notes you submitted, © even though not previously considered by the Board,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR11256 14
NR11256-14 22 January 2015 This is in reference to your counsel’s letter on your behalf dated 25 September 2014 with enclosures, seeking reconsideration of your previous application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552, In your previous case, docket number 9039-13, you requested reinstatement to your class and promotion to lieutenant colonel and colonel. This request was denied on 14 August 2014. , A three-member...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5598 14
Your current request has been carefully examined by a three- member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, any material submitted in support of your application, and your previous case file. Consequently, when _applying for a correction of an official record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2577 14
Your current request has been carefully examined by a three- member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, any material . New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in your case.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 08069-08
You further requested reconsideration for retention in the Navy. It is noted that the Navy Personnel Command (NPC) corrected the PSR as you requested, in August 2008. A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 March 2009.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3329 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your reconsideration request on 28 April 2014. You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material evidence or other matter not previously considered by Docket No.NRO03329-14 the Board. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6533 14
You were advised via our letter dated 24 September 2013 (your case was Boarded 23 September 2013), that your aoplication had been denied. Documentary materials considered by the Board consisted of your applicaticn, together with all materials submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and pclicies. after careful and) conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board) found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to etablish the...